Hunger
Ronster | February 16, 2009We just watched ‘Hunger’, the movie about the Hunger Strikers in the Maze prison in 1981.
I’m kind of at a loss as to what I felt about it. On the one hand it looks amazing, and you can tell that it has been made by someone, ie Steve McQueen, who comes from a visual-arts background. There are lots of long, lingering shots that are very beautifully constructed, any of which are the sort of thing you’d expect to see in a video-installation.
On the other hand, and I may be seeing this through the eyes of someone who wasn’t very old (2) at the time these events occurred, but I never got a sense of the tragedy of the story. It felt like a clinical and cold examination of a time and place, and at no point did the humanity of the characters seem important to the director, with one notable exception. There is a now infamous 17 minute scene at the centre of the film wherein Bobby Sands explains his intent to starve himself to his priest. It’s a brilliant scene, well acted by the participants. The camera is locked down for the duration,and it does feel very stagey, although I don’t mean that in a pejoritative manner. It’s the sort of acting one rarely sees onscreen; unshowy, naturalistic and familiar.
Unfortunately this scene is probably the only point where I felt I was getting to know any character. The rest of the film is concerned with showing the inhumane treatment of the prisoners and the subsequent deterioration of Sands to his eventual death.
I’m sure a more moving depiction of the events could be made, but that’s clearly not the intention of the director here. It’s a unique achievement, but I’m not sure that I’ll ever watch it again. I just felt singularly unmoved by the whole experience. Still, it looks incredible, and perhaps it should be judged more as a piece of art rather than as a motion picture.










I’ve been looking for a decent iPhone blogging tool for a while, so discovering that iBlogger was discounted down to 59p was all I needed to read. 






